Openness in Animal Research Dialogue
Sciencewise co-funded project 2013
The most recent Ipsos Mori poll on public attitudes to the use of animals in scientific research showed a small but significant (7-10%) decline in the public acceptability of animal research in medicine – overall though there is high conditional acceptance of use of animals in research (c. 85%).
Impacts & Value
• The main impact of the dialogue has been to provide solid reassurance that the Concordat is, indeed, in line with public views.
• There have also been some small, but real, changes to the Concordat and the associated guidance document. In particular, the citation of the dialogue and the exploration of the specific things that public participants raised as being important. These included publishing details of how many animals are used and why, the use of images and films, and the need to demonstrate that efforts are made to ensure research is not duplicated.
• The dialogue findings were also used to defend against potential dilutions of Concordat commitments as they evolved – for example, to use images in communications, and to allow access to laboratories.
Case study published - February 2015
Dialogue report published (November 2013).
Workshops held in July & Aug 2013.
What the public said
“I want to know how many tests were done by a particular organisation and how many of them were successful and drugs came out, how many failed and how many were not going to make the medication better so had to waste money, time and the poor animal who lost its life.”Public Participant
“More Home Office inspectors that could increase the number of random spot checks, and independent monitors with a minimum level of qualifications, competently and adequately trained.”Public Participant
Reports and Resources
- BUAV video final
- Openness in animal researchPublic dialogue report
- Openness in animal researchPublic dialogue appendices
- Openness in animal researchInterim evaluation of public dialogue
- Openness in animal research case study
- Openness in animal research evaluation
- Talking head video - Becky Purvis, Head of PolicyAssociation of Medical Research Charities (AMRC)
- Talking head video - Nick Palmer, Director of Policy (BUAV)British Union for the Abolition of Vivisection
- Talking head video - Professor Eleanor Riley (Immunology)London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine
The Medical Research Council (MRC)
The MRC is a publicly funded organisation dedicated to improving human health through world class medical research, and is the commissioning agent.
Understanding Animal Research
Understanding Animal Research provides information about animal research and testing and the resulting advances in science and medicine. UAR are leading project delivery.
Dialogue deliverer. Ipsos MORI, part of the Ipsos Group, is a leading UK research company, specialising in social & political research and public dialogue on complex and sensitive issues.
Dialogue evaluator. 3KQ is a company of independent facilitators and evaluators specialising in dialogue processes on contentious topics.
Find Out More
- Animal research 'pledge on openness' agreed
- Concordat on openness on animal research
- Ipsos MORI 2012 survey on Views on the use of animals in scientific research
- Openness Concordat consultationUnderstanding Animal Research
- Press release: 72 Organisations sign concordat on openness on animal research in the UKUnderstanding Animal Research