assets/Uploads/Project-images/_resampled/SetWidth93-animals.jpg

Animals Containing Human Material

Sciencewise-ERC funded project 2010

Background

Led by the Academy of Medical Sciences, this public dialogue project forms part of a broader study on the use of animals containing human material in scientific research. Find out more about the project background.

Aims and Objectives

  • Engage members of the public in dialogue on the issues raised by the current and future use of animals containing human material in research.
  • Provide opportunities for members of the public to discuss and explore their aspirations and concerns about current and future issues related to the research use of animals containing human material.
  • Identify areas of consensus, disagreement or uncertainty on a broad range of issues raised by current and possible future scientific developments, and explore both initial views and changes in opinion.
  • Inform the final recommendations made by the Academy for public policy and research needs.
  • Enable the Academy and the wider science community to build on previous experience in public dialogue, to pioneer innovative approaches in public engagement and to develop knowledge and understanding of public dialogue and its potential for future applications.

Delivered By

Academy of Medical Sciences
The Academy of Medical Sciences (AMS) is the independent body in the UK representing the whole spectrum of medical science. Its mission is to ensure better healthcare through the rapid application of research to the practice of medicine.

Department of Health
The Department of Health (DH) is the government department responsible for public health issues. It exists to improve the health and wellbeing of people in England.

Read more

Latest Status Update

Report from the ACHM working group study published

Evaluation report published, November 2010

British Science Association reports on results from Animals Containing Human Material

AMS appoints Ipsos MORI led consortium to explore public views on research using animals containing human material. Read more.


Key Impacts

  • Public participants enjoyed the workshops and described them as interesting, informative and thought‐provoking. There was considerable evidence of views changing throughout the dialogue, especially during Workshop 1. The mechanisms for this change appeared to be the provision of new information and listening to each others’ views.
  • In follow up interviews the experts felt that they had been inspired to do more science communication after realising the level of public interest in science and the impact that it can have.
  • The dialogue report had led some stakeholder interviewees to reflect on their own opinions, and perhaps see the issue from a different perspective, while for others there was an opportunity for insight into a dialogue process.

Project Quotes

“This Government is committed to ensuring the UK remains a great place to do science. Getting the regulation around research right, in a way that commands public confidence, is part of that mission. This report makes a valuable contribution to that agenda by combining expert advice with the insight gained from public dialogue on the issue. It is vital that we continue to listen to the public’s hopes and concerns whenever we consider developments in cutting-edge science.”
David Willetts MP, Minister of State for Universities and Science
“We welcome the valuable contribution of this study to the understanding of the complex ethical, scientific and animal welfare issues involved in this area of research. We will consider the recommendations carefully.”
Lynne Featherstone, Home Office Minister
“It is absolutely right for the scientific community to be open about the work we do and any potential ethical issues it might raise.”
Sir Mark Walport, Director of the Wellcome Trust